fot
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Buttonwillow

To: FOT@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: Buttonwillow
From: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 09:39:10 -0700
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01BE875E.7F0A2970
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

You already know the answer Steve. It's junk.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gt6steve@aol.com [mailto:Gt6steve@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 6:11 PM
To: Chasgee@aol.com; Smockracer@aol.com; Kaskas@earthlink.net;
FOT@autox.team.net
Subject: Buttonwillow


Greetings Amigo's,
I'm a bit disturbed tonight.  It looks like the crank grinder got my # 1 
cylinder rod journal a bit off center when redoing the crank.  The piston 
stands proud about .020 at TDC.
The best solution would be to turn another crank and assemble.  This crank
is 
.030 & .040 so it is reaching the end of it's useful life.  I hate to turn a

good crank to these dimensions to save $175 in bearings.  I hate to buy 
another set of bearings to fit a new crank.
I could deck a piston to fit this new stroke and run it as is until a new 
crank is called for.  Then It would take at least one new piston to reach 
zero deck with a good crank.
This crank would still be good for a street motor.
Using another crank would take bearings, polishing and balancing and perhaps

decking the pistons depending upon the accuracy of the rod journal centers.

I would have to ensure the crank grinder polished for the MGB bearings.  Can

I find a set of MGB bearings in  the new overbore?
Am I talking myself into doing it right instead of quick and cheap?  I'm 
working on it.  Please send your thoughts.  Bye Steve

------_=_NextPart_001_01BE875E.7F0A2970
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>RE: Buttonwillow</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>You already know the answer Steve. It's junk.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Gt6steve@aol.com [<A 
HREF="mailto:Gt6steve@aol.com";>mailto:Gt6steve@aol.com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 6:11 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: Chasgee@aol.com; Smockracer@aol.com; 
Kaskas@earthlink.net;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>FOT@autox.team.net</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: Buttonwillow</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Greetings Amigo's,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>I'm a bit disturbed tonight.&nbsp; It looks like the crank 
grinder got my # 1 </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>cylinder rod journal a bit off center when redoing the 
crank.&nbsp; The piston </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>stands proud about .020 at TDC.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>The best solution would be to turn another crank and 
assemble.&nbsp; This crank is </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>.030 &amp; .040 so it is reaching the end of it's useful 
life.&nbsp; I hate to turn a </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>good crank to these dimensions to save $175 in bearings.&nbsp; 
I hate to buy </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>another set of bearings to fit a new crank.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>I could deck a piston to fit this new stroke and run it as is 
until a new </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>crank is called for.&nbsp; Then It would take at least one new 
piston to reach </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>zero deck with a good crank.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>This crank would still be good for a street motor.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Using another crank would take bearings, polishing and 
balancing and perhaps </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>decking the pistons depending upon the accuracy of the rod 
journal centers.&nbsp; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>I would have to ensure the crank grinder polished for the MGB 
bearings.&nbsp; Can </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>I find a set of MGB bearings in&nbsp; the new overbore?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Am I talking myself into doing it right instead of quick and 
cheap?&nbsp; I'm </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>working on it.&nbsp; Please send your thoughts.&nbsp; Bye 
Steve</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01BE875E.7F0A2970--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>