fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Axle solutions - confused ....

To: EISANDIEGO@aol.com, fot@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Axle solutions - confused ....
From: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@server1.mail.virginia.edu>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 17:00:03 -0400
Hi Cary,
      First, I apologize for not getting the part numbers for my
conversion to you yet.  I had planned on digging through my
file of receipts this weekend, but ended up going water skiing
instead - sorry.

At 04:07 PM 8/7/00 -0400, EISANDIEGO@aol.com wrote:
>     Can some explain to me what the relative advantages/disadvantages are to
>the Corvair, Ford and other conversions? Do I understand correctly that the
>Corvair conversion has been used succesfully for along time?

Yes, it has.

>So why is it that we are looking at Ford and other alternatives?

The Corvair axles have been used in the cars with the independent
rear suspension, especially the TR-4A's and TR-6's.  The Ford conversion
is for the solid axle cars like TR-3's and TR-4's.

>Has any body heard from Kas about this ?

Not recently since he has been attending the VTR convention in
Portland, OR as guest of honor, but I suspect that he might have
some useful insight.


>Cary

Hope that helps,

John Lye
rjl6n@Virginia.edu


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>