>From what I read, the contract with MO expired after this year, so they put it
>out to bid. Low bidder won. I think that it is close to HQ helps and there
>may have been some government incentives. Many of the national level racers
>are not too happy about the new track. Somewhat of a dust bowl and very
>little elevation change. The track is supposedly making improvements. Joe(B)
-- BillDentin@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 05/04/2005 6:35:28 PM Central Daylight Time,
Gt6steve@aol.com writes:
> I wonder if SCCA's abandonment of M-O involves similar complaints and
> conversely, does their newfound concern relate to the loss of the Runoffs?
>
Good point. I don't know any high mucky-mucks in the SCCA to find out, but
rather my guess would be it involved geographical considerations....more
central location, close to new headquarters, etc.
Bill
Now includes pop-up blocker!
Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.netzero.com/surf to sign up today!
|