fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] injection vs webers

To: "Terry and Cindy" <roadandtrack@bigpond.com>, <fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Fot] injection vs webers
From: "MadMarx" <tr4racing@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 08:10:44 +0200
I'm not sure you'll be successful.
Weber don't have a wide range. You have to deside: Power at low or at high 
range.

I would suppose your injection to be more flexible than Webers when you 
alter the mixture curve plate (don't know the english name).

Cheers
Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terry and Cindy" <roadandtrack@bigpond.com>
To: <fot@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Fot] injection vs webers


> I'm preparing for some dyno work on our spare 2500 race engine. It 
> currently
> runs Lucas injection (very sucessfully), but I'm tempted to try some 
> webers
> to get a bit more mid range punch. Has anyone does any back-to-back
> comparisions with 40 vs 42 vs 45 or even vs Lucas injection??
> I've got various sets of webers to try, but would appreciate any comments
> before I start out
> Thanks, terry o'beirne, Australia
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Fot mailing list
> Fot@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
>
> You are subscribed as tr4racing@googlemail.com 
_______________________________________________
http://www.team.net/donate.html

Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>