[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] engine assembly web page

To: Mark Eginton <>, ""
Subject: Re: [Fot] engine assembly web page
From: Tony Drews <>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:33:03 -0500
Mark, I've run this design for a few years  (probably at least 5 if I 
think about it) and don't have starvation issues due to the 
baffle.  I do still see oil pressure drop in the left hand corners if 
the engine's oil level is too low.  Adding a quart fixes that for a while.

It's possible that a more elaborate design would let me run a bit 
lower oil level.

I don't remember the exact gap, but 1/2" sounds about right.  It 
ended up this way because the car already had a portion of the baffle 
in there - we just added the piece that takes it full length of the 
pan (and has the gap to the bottom).  That's the 2nd piece you mention.

- Tony

At 10:00 AM 3/28/2009, Mark Eginton wrote:
>Thanks for taking the time to publish these pics. I am just about to 
>doctor my oil pan. Noticed that you went top to bottom with the 
>baffle for the length of the opening on one side. I understood the 
>comp manual says it should float 3/8" (I think) from the bottom. 
>Have you run this design? I like the idea. Also I am guessing there 
>is no need for a baffle on the other side or across the pan for hard 
>braking? A COTS pan (commercial off the shelf) for my mustang boxed 
>the pickup with trap doors which is why I was curious - overkill???
>On the front of the pan where second peice is welded to the primary 
>peice, I eyeball the float off the bottom of the pan to be ~1/2"?
>Thanks again for the pics!!!
>Support Team.Net
>Fot mailing list
Support Team.Net

Fot mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>