fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] Ross Pistons?

To: "Scott Janzen" <sjanzen@me.com>,fot-bounces@autox.team.net,"'Friends of Triumph' Triumph" <fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Fot] Ross Pistons?
From: jason@multivintage.com
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 21:51:11 +0000
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: fot@autox.team.net
References: <B8B93A61-12EF-4B9E-866C-C93FB0BA82F8@me.com>
Sensitivity: Normal
You all know by now that I typically vote for what is best by track proven 
authority .  
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Janzen <sjanzen@me.com>
To: 'Friends of Triumph' Triumph<fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: [Fot] Ross Pistons?

I am building up a second (primary?) engine for the GT6.  I have a set of
barely used Ross pistons that currently have a gapless top ring, a traditional
second ring and an oil ring (third). I will be installing new rings and honing
the block.
The pistons weigh about 40 grams less than the Venolia pistons I have
historically used with no troubles.  Seems like the lighter weight should be a
plus, unless they are more prone to breakage . . .
I'm looking for feedback, positive or negative, with Ross pistons.  I'm not
looking to throw money at new pistons, but hate to build up a motor and skimp
somewhere that will cost me down the road.

Anybody?
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>