fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] Tri Y header vs Equal length

To: Mike Harmuth <ofracer@gmail.com> MLhPe8biVftIo+mplrKPl66L2VmsNdvZKPZGPcgyDr8eKPRHQQpQJcjeIFWs/BaqUVQyZ0/a2Le3XQk4RbDcCTYx1fXg+7V9/jtBMSVk0Ksdz6cq/0chtp+b
Subject: Re: [Fot] Tri Y header vs Equal length
From: Jim Gray <toodamnfunky@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 05:46:15 -0600
Cc: FoTTriumph <fot@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: fot@autox.team.net
References: <CAO0FjVYHqjUVP-kSvvJ3N+BpMCEVF6JMHV=xg0i_5xGR4gN+UA@mail.gmail.com>
Longer primary tubes give you better
Low & mid range, short primaries for top end power
Jg

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 12, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Mike Harmuth <ofracer@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I've been running Tri Y headers on the Spitfire for years, I heard they help 
> with low to mid range power (yes or no?). I see Checkered Flag racing has 
> obtained the fixtures to to start producing Stahl headers again. I know the 
> car had a Stahl header in the past and it has the bell housing is notched, 
> the frame flattened out but the former owner has passed so I can't ask him 
> anything.
> 
> What should I expect from the long, equal length header, just more top end 
> with less low to mid power or better performance overall?
> 
> 1296 engine with the Kastner books mods to the heads, twin SU HS4s.
> 
> thanks
> mike
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fot@autox.team.net
> 
> http://www.fot-racing.com
> 
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: 
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/toodamnfunky@comcast.net
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>