healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective

To: Dave & Marlene <rusd@velocitus.net>
Subject: Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective
From: bn1@pacbell.net
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:09:32 -0700
You didn't, perhaps, see the movie THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW, did you?

Asbestos is on, let the flames begin!  And yes, it will be argued
forever!

Bill Barnett
Santa Ana, CA
'53 BN1 # 663
& the exempt '72 240 Z

Dave & Marlene wrote:

> Alan,
>
> There are other ligitimate points of view on CO2/global warming. Here is
> one: http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html
> I guess that it depends on the horse you wish to support. Not all have
> been brainwashed into the "green thing". Note particularly that water
> vapor is by far the most significant factor in the green house effect.
> Something that your sources apparently choose to leave out. In my
> opinion, you and the greens are ignoring facts that put global warming
> in proper perspective.  Believe what you will. It will be argued forever.
>
> Dave Russell
>
> Blue One Hundred wrote:
> > Mike -
> >
> > There are two types of polution - visible (unburnt
> > hydrocarbons) and invisible (CO2 - green house
> > gasses).
> >
> > The proportion between the two varies depending on how
> > "clean" you car is, but at the end of the day the
> > total wieght of carbon your car puts in the atmosphere
> > is directly correspondent to your gas mileage.
> >
> > California laws and regulation are totally focused on
> > the "visible" pollution... but totally ignores
> > invisible pollution (CO2 - greenhouse gas).  So all it
> > means are the greens are erroneously focused on
> > visible pollution... when in the long run its the
> > invisible pollution that matters.
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Alan





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>