healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Smitty Problem

To: Dave & Marlene <rusd@velocitus.net>
Subject: Re: Smitty Problem
From: "M.E. & E.A. Driver" <edriver@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 12:56:39 -0600
Hi Dave

This thread peaked my curiosity.  Like you and John I'm in favour
of the soft steel brake line but I note with interest in two of many
catalogues I have from the UK that copper tubing 3/16 to  5/16's
plus the nickel/copper alloy  are  still being sold for Morgans by a Morgan
outlet while  in a generalist catalogue  the  same is offered.  I wonder
if we are missing something?

Kind regards
Ed
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
www.vintage-sportscar-touring.ca
'65 BJ8              '89 Morgan 4/4


Dave & Marlene wrote:
> John,
> 
> Several materials have been / are being used for brake piping.
> First & worst is regular copper. Copper work hardens with vibration & 
> flexing & fatigue cracks. Not good for brake or fuel lines.
> 
> Low carbon annealed steel has been used for many years. It is not 
> subject to fatigue failure but has rust & corrosion problems.
> 
> Various coatings have been used to protect the steel, such as, copper & 
> tin plating. A typical brand is "Bundy"
> 
> A 90% copper - 10% nickel alloy (UNS C70600) has been used in Europe for 
> many years. It has the fatigue resistant qualities of steel & very high 
> corrosion resistance. I don't know whether present US car manufacturers 
> & racing organizations are sanctioning It's use or not.
> 
> The confusion may be between copper, copper plated steel, & 90/10 copper 
> - nickel. The all appear to be somewhat copper color & all contain copper.
> 
> Dave Russell
> BN2
> 
> John Miller wrote:
> 
>> You're not using copper for brakes lines, are you?  They *will* fail, 
>> which of course will always happen at the worst possible time.  





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>