My new 1956 BN2 came to me without undercoating (but with mirrors on
the fenders/wings because I asked for them) and the dealer didn't ask
me or urge me to take any undercoating. Dealer: Peter Satori in
Pasadena CA. I suspect that at least all the California dealers
didn't bother with undercoating 'cons'. Maybe in other parts of the
country?
-Roland
BJ7, BN1
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:26:46 -0400, you wrote:
::Actually undercoating was the most COMMONLY installed dealer option because
::it was a huge profit item. The price was $300 for approximately $3.00 worth
::of product. This $300 was already added the invoice before you even saw the
::car.
::You would have had to be been standing in the dealer lot when car carrier
::came in and fight the dealer to get a car that wasn't undercoated.
::
::Dallas Congleton
::1953 MGTD2
::1967 Austin Healey 3000 MarkIII
Check out the new British Cars Forum:
http://www.team.net/the-local/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=8
|