healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] SMOG TESTS SB 1549 Senate Bill

To: Richard Ewald <richard.ewald@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Healeys] SMOG TESTS SB 1549 Senate Bill
From: David Nock <healeydoc@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:25:16 -0700
I think we all are missing the point here. I will start by saying  
that the smog requirements on the newer cars is great, they are  
driven many miles and should be going thru a regular smog test. But  
there comes a point that the test becomes redicules. How many 70 and  
early 80 cars are there on the road. When was the last time you say a  
80s Chrysler K series on the road. How many 78 MGBs have you seen as  
a regular driver, or a 67 Mustang. These cars are almost all in very  
good condition and are rarely driven.  When we were having to smog  
the cars back as far as 1967 vehicle it was a major pain in the ass  
to get them to pass. If you really look at the big picture here if  
they get the foot in the door on smog tests on vehicles prior to 1975  
where do they stop. The next thing you no is that your $60,000.00  
Healey that will not pass a smog test is worthless since you cant  
drive it anymore.

Next lets look at who is doing these smog tests.  The techs are all  
very familiar with a 1998 what ever vehicle and if they are not sure  
there is a service manual that they can refer to. Now take you 1959  
Austin Healey or you 1967 Mustang into that same shop and see if they  
can tell you what is original and what isn't.

This new law will make a impact on the entire classic car market.  
Everything from many Classic car insurance companys,  parts  
suppliers, automotive detial supplies, auction companies and many  
many more.



David Nock
British Car Specialists
Stockton Ca 95205
209-948-8767

www.britishcarspecialists.com
.
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>