Randy,
Yes, the BJ7 would have had the LJ225 jack, most likely the earlier one
without the reinforced activating yoke where the tommy bar fits in. These
earlier ones have the marking CA259 cast into the weaker activating yoke.
The later model LJ225 has the thicker activating yoke collar and has CA311
cast into it.
Rich Chrysler
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Dickson" <rdickson@midwestarchaeology.com>
To: <healeys@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:26 PM
Subject: [Healeys] Shelley jack question
> Fellow Healeyoids,
>
>
>
> Would the 225 model be the correct Shelley jack for a 63 BJ7 VIN 20,040?
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Randy
>
> 63 BJ7
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Healeys@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
>
> You are subscribed as richchrysler@quickclic.net
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
http://www.team.net/archive
|