G'day
Yes that would have made a difference, but also the BMC C-series engine was
cast by gravity feed of molten iron into a sand casting, while the Nissan
engine would have been pressure cast with thinwall construction.
Sort of like the huge weight difference when Ford introduced the legendary
pressure cast 260/289 V8.
Hoo Roo
Patrick Quinn
-----Original Message-----
From: healeys-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:healeys-bounces@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of TERRY COLL
Sent: Wednesday, 30 December 2009 6:01 PM
To: pennell@cox.net; healey.nut@gmail.com; editorgary@aol.com; austin healey
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Healeys to Japan
240Z head is aluminum, block is iron. Surely some weight savings there.
Terry Coll
'64 BJ8
> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:10:51 -0500
> From: pennell@cox.net
> To: healey.nut@gmail.com; Editorgary@aol.com; healeys@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [Healeys] Healeys to Japan
>
> Alan and others,
>
> Was/Is there any weight savings with the 240 engine over the 3000 engine?
Is
the 240 engine alum?
>
> Keith Pennell
>
> ---- >
> You are subscribed as coll44@msn.com
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
You are subscribed as p_cquinn@tpg.com.au
http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
http://www.team.net/archive
|