healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] paints

To: healeys@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Healeys] paints
From: warthodson@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:20:43 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: healeys@autox.team.net
References: <20130128031724.24289.qmail@server278.com>
So far most of the comments have been in favor of single stage because it
looks more like the original paint or is cheaper. At Conclave for instance, I
am not sure I can distinguish between cars painted with a single stage paint &
ones painted with a base coat/clear coat system. I can identify cars with
excellent paint jobs from ones with lower quality paint jobs, but that is
something completely different. An anecdotal or is it an empirical example: A
friend in our local Healey club has been telling us for years that his car was
painted with a single stage paint. It is a high quality paint job. We all
thought the paint looked "original". After a recent accident, the body shop
told him that his car had a base coat/clear coat paint job. The owner was as
surprised as the rest of us. The shop was able to match the paint
(non-metallic) exactly & we cannot tell which panels have been repainted &
which have not.

Not much about hardness/chip resistance. Recently, I saw a frame being painted
black with Dupont Imron which I read is a polyester enamel, what ever that is.
It looked beautiful. I was told it was chosen because it is very hard/chip
resistant. Comments?
Thanks,
Gary
_______________________________________________
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>