healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] Did iridescent colours originally have clear coat over the

To: healeys@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Did iridescent colours originally have clear coat over them?
From: carroll phillips <bjcap@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:04:21 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: healeys@autox.team.net
References: <mailman.6.1422730801.22822.healeys@autox.team.net>
User-agent: Laszlo Mail 3
50s,60s Austin Healeys were painted in the enamel chemistry of the day ( 
synthetic enamel), Jags too. Synthetic enamels were not clear coated and 
MG used it on their TD wings and lacquer on the bodies of certain 
colors, about the same time as the Healey 100 , I am referring to both 
metallics and solid colors

I would personally not use a lacquer base and urethane clear coat.  

 I have used the next finest metallic from the bottom of the chart , 
sprayed a little heavy , the metallic flakes will sink in  and not 
reflect light as much  appearing  as a fine metallic. You need a GOOD 
gun for this , I use an Iwata LPH400 for clear and the Super Nova for 
base 1.4 tip.

Best I can say is try it out on a test panel using different application 
technics till you are satisfied. You have no choice as modern paints 
simply do not look as the older ones did . EPA regulations took care of 
that a while ago and again, with waterborne materials coming up fast the 
restorer has to adapt.

Carroll Phillips
Top Down Restorations
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys

Unsubscribe/Manage: 
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/mharc@autox.team.net

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>