After looking (as I should have don't earlier) at it again, I realized I had
jumped to a fast and wrong conclusion. My bad.
tom
---- Curtis Arndt <cnaarndt@gmail.com> wrote:
=============
Per, thank you for stating this a lot simpler than I did.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Per Schoerner <per@schoerner.se> wrote:
> Guys
> It's a 100, with a front shroud from a BJ8 lying on top of it.
>
> Per
>
> Den 2016-09-18 kl. 14:16, skrev Tom Felts:
>
>> With thos run ning lights, it has to be a BJ8 and at least a 64-67. IMO.
>>
>>
>> ---- i erbs <eyera3000@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> =============
>> Looks like a 62. From the grill and roadster
>> Cowel. More $50 in parts. Too far to ship to Oregon')
>> Ira Erbs
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Suggested annual donation $12.75
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>
> Healeys@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
>
> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/
> options/healeys/cnaarndt@gmail.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
|