land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Water cooled vs. Air cooled engines

To: "'Waldron, James'" <James.Waldron@CWUSA.COM>, land-speed@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: Water cooled vs. Air cooled engines
From: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 12:09:07 -0500
Jim;

Practical considerations many times outweigh theoretical advantages of a
particular design. 

I have a friend who flew P-51 Mustangs in Europe during WWII. Flying cross-
country before he was transferred overseas, he bailed out of a P-40 Warhawk
when it lost all its glycol coolant and the engine (V-12 Allison) seized.
Liquid- cooled engines were vulnerable in areas that air- cooled engines
were not-- Sometimes planes such as Hellcats, Corsairs, and Thunderbolts
returned from combat with air- cooled cylinders shot off but they could
still fly home. 

Some pilots enjoyed having a big multi- row air- cooled radial engine up
front as a bullet shield as well as a powerplant!

Regards, Neil     Tucson, AZ

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>