land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 120 degrees field of view

To: "Rich Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>, <wester6935@comcast.net>, "Jon
Subject: Re: 120 degrees field of view
From: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:05:37 -0700
Rich, his eyeballs vibrate when he's standing still. LOL
GB
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rich Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>
To: <wester6935@comcast.net>; "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; "Jon 
Wennerberg" <jon@infodestruction.com>; "landspeed@autox.team.net List" 
<land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: 120 degrees field of view


> It is my understanding that it was Jacks eyeballs that were vibrating. 
> Maybe suspension would be called for.   RF
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <wester6935@comcast.net>
> To: "Rich Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; 
> "Jon Wennerberg" <jon@infodestruction.com>; "landspeed@autox.team.net 
> List" <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:55 PM
> Subject: Re: 120 degrees field of view
>
>
>> Wonder what image stabilization would do to help out in thi situation? 
>> Could create additional problems beyond those it solves.
>>
>> Signal transmission on the salt is a very iffy thing.  We have had years 
>> where CB's wouldn't work for two miles and other years where you could 
>> pick up truckers from the east coast and Texas with some bounce.
>>
>> Wes
>>
>> -------------- Original message ----------------------
>> From: "Rich Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>
>>> Jack eventually gave up on that deal because of vibration making it hard 
>>> for
>>> him to focus. Perhaps Jack could jump in here and give his thoughts. 
>>> RF
>>> ----- Original




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>