mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Discussion Topics

To: "Gregory Kirk" <gkirk@empirenet.com>,
Subject: RE: Discussion Topics
From: "doug russell" <dr-doug@classic.msn.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 97 03:17:12 UT
Ah, I think that's really 1,332.  You forgot the one who will wonder what any 
of this has to do with Frank Zappa.

Dr. Doug 


-----Original Message-----
From:   owner-mgs@autox.team.net  On Behalf Of Gregory Kirk
Sent:   Wednesday, November 19, 1997 3:04 PM
To:     mgs@autox.team.net
Subject:        Re: Discussion Topics

Frank R. Krajewski wrote:

> Seems like we waste a great deal of time and space discussing items
> that
> are or are not appropriate for discussion! Like this entry is a waste
> of
> time and space. Does it also appear to be tautological?  Just had to
> put
> my .01 in since someone has already laid claim to .02.
> Frank Krajewski, "Swamp Yankee from RI"

   Well onthe topic of being off topic.... if it makes you feel better
think of it in terms of being a MG tail light bulb....

Greg


Q:  How many internet mail list subscribers does it take
    to change a light bulb?

A:  1,331:
        1 to change the light bulb and to post to the mail
          list that the light bulb has been changed
       14 to share similar experiences of changing light
          bulbs and how the light bulb could have been
          changed differently.
        7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs.
       27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about
          changing light bulbs.
       53 to flame the spell checkers
      156 to write to the list administrator complaining about
          the light bulb discussion and its inappropriateness
          to this mail list.
       41 to correct spelling in the spelling/grammar flames.
      109 to post that this list is not about light bulbs and
          to please take this email exchange to alt.lite.bulb
      203 to demand that cross posting to alt.grammar,
          alt.spelling and alt.punctuation about changing
          light bulbs be stopped.
      111 to defend the posting to this list saying that we
          are all use light bulbs and therefore the posts
          **are** relevant to this mail list.
      306 to debate which method of changing light
          bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs,
          what brand of light bulbs work best for this
          technique, and what brands are faulty.
       27 to post URLs where one can see examples of
          different light bulbs
       14 to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly, and
          to post corrected URLs.
        3 to post about links they found from the URLs that
          are relevant to this list which makes light bulbs
          relevant to this list.
       33 to concatenate all posts to date, then quote
          them including all headers and footers, and then
          add "Me Too."
       12 to post to the list that they are unsubscribing
          because they cannot handle the light bulb
          controversey.
       19 to quote the "Me Too's" to say, "Me Three."
        4 to suggest that posters request the light bulb FAQ.
        1 to propose new alt.change.lite.bulb newsgroup.
       47 to say this is just what alt.physic.cold_fusion
          was meant for, leave it here.
      143 votes for alt.lite.bulb.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>