mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: OK, here's another one...

To: gardner7@pilot.infi.net
Subject: Re: OK, here's another one...
From: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison)
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 17:08:08 EST
On Thu, 22 Jan 1998 09:37:59 +0000 "Scott Gardner"
<gardner7@pilot.infi.net> writes:
>> US DOT regulations.
>>   Requires the wipers to cover a specific percentage of the 
>windscreen (I
>> don't remember the exact percentage).  The twin wipers on the MGB 
>and
>> Midget didn't cover enough. 
>>   SO, in their infinite wisdom, the boys at the works added another 
>arm
>> and blade.
>>  Incidentily, the triple blades were on roadsters. The GT with it's
>> larger windscreen and slightly longer wiper blades made the cut.
>> Rick Morrison
>> 72 MGBGT
>> 74 Midget
>> 
>
>It also has to do with the geometry of the windshield wiper motor and 
>arms on the 'B'.  If you just had two 10" blades, but each one went 
>through 180 degrees of sweep, you would have a total swept area of 
>314 square inches, which would probably be enough to satisfy US DOT 
>regs.  Some trucks and airplanes use this type of semi-circular sweep 
>pattern.  Because the axis of rotation of the MGB wipers is so far 
>from the blade, a third blade was the easiest way to go.  To get a 
>full 180-degree sweep, you have to have the shaft of the 
>wiper motor exit the body right at the upper or lower edge of the 
>windshield, and that just doesn't look right on most cars.
>Scott

Hmm,
  Good point.
Rick Morrison
72 MGBGT
74 Midget

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>