mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: More Shaking Cars

To: "Phil Vanner" <pvanner@pclink.com>, "MG List" <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: More Shaking Cars
From: "Jason Dutt" <jason@markerman.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 14:47:58 -0400
The car had a monstrous amount of shake before any of this was started.  The
repairs/mods were made because those areas were shot...even the wheels were
bent.  This car was the classic case of "it works great for the first 6
months you have it, then everything goes to crap."

>
> Lets see. Did it shake after the rear spax conversion?

Yes.

> After the
> front went
> in?

Yes, but not as bad.

>After the new tires and wheels went on?

This improved the situation a whole lot, but it's still present at higher
speeds, like I said.

>Did you change a
> bunch of stuff
> all at the same time?

Yes and no.  The rear was done one season.  The next season, the front and
new wheels were added, but not at the same time.  I made the mistake of
thinking that the front end was probably the culprit, and although it did
seem to help, it didn't totally fix it.

> Who did the
> spax conversion?

A local MG specialist.

>are you sure everything went in right?

As sure as I can be.

>What about A-arm
> bushings?

New

> Did you put the spax in because your front shocks were
> completely
> shot?

Yup.

>The front shock is still in there now isn't it? How are >the shock
> arms? Mine were all sloppy before I put in rebuilt >shocks, and
> the rebuilts
> got rid of a lot of shake. It isn't functioning as a >shock anymore but it
> is still the upper link of your front suspension. If it's worn
> out you need
> to replace it. I also think that with these conversions, you
> leave the oil
> in the shock, but remove the valve. I guess a leaky one might be
> a problem
> too then.

This is an area I should check on.  I'm not sure now what he actually did
with the old shock.  I know those things were SUPPOSED to be done, but who
knows?

=J=


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>