When I was 20 and 160 lbs and just out of the Corps it was ok,
Today it would be dial 911 Carl E.
"James H. Nazarian, Ph.D." wrote:
> Lets all pick on Bud!
>
> This isn't a "sexist thread" (are you implying that the guys are the
>sexists?)...
> If I remember a few lines back, it was the gal who pulled the guy into the
>car!
> Then, did I not read that she was on top of, and facing him? Or was that
>someone's
> fantasy? Sounds like a party to me!!!
>
> Now, for you Michael Graziano; all 5'-11" and 200 lbs. of you. I recall
>someone
> with your same name starting another sexist thread regarding a young lady
> complaining about being kissed by a former roommate, yadda, yadda.
>
> Was she the one you described, and I quote "Nope...... And top on (not hers)
> ...... Like I said, just uncomfortable. Better in a remote spot outside the
> car."
>
> Fascinating turn. Fascinating thread. Damn sight more exciting than bleeding
> brakes.;-))
>
> Jim
>
> Albert F Jones wrote:
>
> > No Bud,
> >
> > Not at all. It just seems to me that the more responses (this one
> > included) that are made, the more is made of the subject. Ergo, treating
> > it with the ******** that it deserves. We have all, at some time or
> > another perhaps, had no interest in the subject matter of a posting. We
> > all have a delete key. I am quite sure that not everyone is interested in
> > some of my postings to the list, and opt to ignore them. That is what the
> > list is all about isn't it? Those side trips that we often make. Some
> > choose not to take the side road, and other choose to follow it. Perhaps
> > the freedom to choose is paramount, and perhaps the choices that one makes
> > signifies one's maturity.
> >
> > Just my own tuppence worth.
> >
> > Elizabeth
> > Freely admitting that you canchoose to read this or not.
> >
> > At 08:30 PM 1/31/00 -0500, Bud Krueger wrote:
> > >Something's not right here. A year or so ago, this sexist thread would
>have
> > >elicited a fair number of comments by now from listers of the fair sex.
>Yet,
> > >not a word. Have we lost the Nory's, Carol's, etc.? I hope not.
> > >
> > >Bud
> > >
> > >"Graziano, Michael" wrote:
> > >
> > >> Nope...... And top on (not hers) ...... And I'm 5'11" and 200 lbs.
> > Like I
> > >> said, just uncomfortable. Better in a remote spot outside the car.
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Brad Fornal [SMTP:toyman@htcomp.net]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 6:30 PM
> > >> > To: Larry Macy
> > >> > Cc: Charles D. Sorkin; Spridgets list; MG List
> > >> > Subject: Re: MGA movie sighting
> > >> >
> > >> > IN A MIDGET!! You must be referring to merely Clintonizing, not the
> > actual
> > >> > deed.
> > >> >
> > >> > Larry Macy wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Like I said, on the Pass seat facing each other.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Anonymous
> > >> > >
> > >> > > At this exact moment in time 1/31/00 12:53 PM, cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com
> > >> > > made the profound statement:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >On the bonnet? That's definitely cheating.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I mean inside, with the top up or down.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Charles
> > >> > > >'74 Midget
> > >> > > >'68 Sprite
> > >> > > >cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com
> > >> > > >Bloomfield, NJ
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >P. S. Does this imply that (Non GT) LBC owners could have, on
> > >> > average,
> > >> > > >fewer children?
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
> > >> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
> > >> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
> > >> If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
>all
> > >> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
>the
> > >> sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
> > >> print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
> > >> recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
> > >> the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any
> > >> views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
>except
> > >> where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
> > >> them to be the views of any such entity.
> > >
> > >--
> > >Bud Krueger
> > >http://home.ici.net/~bkrueger/
> > >52TD
> > >77MGB
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
|