mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: SMOG DOOM

To: "'Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com'" <Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com>
Subject: RE: SMOG DOOM
From: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 09:22:19 -0700
Jay:

        Thanks for the info.  I was wondering what year my next MGB would
be.  I think you have answered my question.  The earlier the better.


Kelvin.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com [mailto:Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 8:58 AM
> To: alpines@autox.team.net; Tigers@autox.team.net;
> british-cars@autox.team.net
> Subject: SMOG DOOM
> 
> 
> I don't intend to create a false alarm or anything, but 
> today's LA Times
> had an article that California is far behind on meeting the 
> Federal Clean
> Air Act.  In a report by "state air-quality officials" from the "air
> board", the primary blame is from the Legislature "weakening" the
> standards.  The report apparently specifically says eliminating an
> exemption for pre-1974 cars would help reduce emissions, and 
> calls for more
> stringent inspections standards and full repair requirements 
> for all cars.
> 
> I will point out that the article also says that California 
> is required to
> reduce smog forming gases by 112 tons each day, but have only 
> reduced it by
> 45.  I have to say that I find it extremely hard to believe 
> that killing
> pre-74 cars will gain 67 tons of emissions.
> 
> Finally, the article says that such changes are apt to be 
> opposed in the
> Legislature and by motorists.  However, the article says that 
> California
> will be subject to fines from the Federal government if we 
> don't meet 112
> tons.  At some point, those fines are going to outweigh upsetting some
> motorists.
> 
> 
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>