mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: rear end question

To: gb@the-bdc.com
Subject: Re: rear end question
From: David Littlefield <dmeadow@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 16:12:49 -0600

On Wed, 1 Nov 2000 16:44:09 -0500 Gordon Bird <gb@the-bdc.com> writes:
> Bill, I may be mistaken, and surely someone will point it out if I 
> am

Er, ahem, that would be me.

> but I believe my '62 A has a 3.9 rear axle. 

Your MGA is a Mark II, which would have the 1622 motor and a 4.1 rear
end.  Certainly a better ratio on the highway than the earlier MGA's, but
not quite a 3.9 of an MGB.

> I know I can travel at 70-75 mph all day long at only @ 3600 - 3800
rpms.

As does mine.  The extra boost from the 1622, particularly over the 1500,
doesn't hurt either.  Although I've now slotted in an MGB motor, which
didn't really give a noticeable improvement in hp from the 1622.

David Littlefield
'62 MGA MkII
'51 MGTD
'74 MG Midget vintage racer
'88 Jaguar XJ-S

________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>