Hi Guys
So why not just go back to a steam engine? Simply generate the steam with a
very small Nuclear Reactor and away we go, warp factor 5! and like the
compressed air idea, we could make an even bigger bomb out of your humble
car. I am all for techno-progress but I am not sure that this is the way we
should to go??
Regards
John J Black
Waterloo Drivetrain Systems
http://www.waterloo-dtr.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-mgs@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-mgs@autox.team.net]On
Behalf Of Dave Wood
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 7:37 AM
To: mgs
Subject: Re: New Car
Why not, it's no different from a steam engine, just uses air from
compressed air tanks. Still takes a lot of electrical or gas engine energy
to fill the tanks whether it is part of the car or at a service station. I
wouldn't want to get in a wreck and puncture a compressed air tank.
Dave 72 B
----- Original Message -----
From: <jimg2@webtv.net>
To: <autojumble@autox.team.net>; <morgans@autox.team.net>;
<mgb-v8@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 4:29 AM
Subject: New Car
Can this be true?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/africa/newsid_988000/988265.stm
|