mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Mgs] 64 B rear ended

To: "Councill, David" <dcouncill@msubillings.edu>, "MG List" <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Mgs] 64 B rear ended
From: "PaulHunt73" <paulhunt73@virginmedia.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:05:36 +0100
Delivered-to: mgs-archive@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: mgs@autox.team.net
References: <E7D7B13F08EBC4438FAEAFB46F80C1FA4F73E11C@BILEXMB02.msubillings.edu>
The bumpers are attached to the chassis rails, not the back panel, so you 
need to get underneath and see where the buckling has occurred that has 
allowed the overrider to deform the back panel - if the overrider had peen 
pushed back as a whole rather than simply the top being tilted over.  Unless 
the rear panel has obviously deformed so that the lock loop is no longer 
inline with the lock on the lid, it could have buckled the boot floor.  Even 
10mph is quite a shunt.  It depends on the insurance company, but some may 
well want to write it off with chassis rail damage.  In the UK that kind of 
damage would be repairable, if you bought the 'wreck' back out of the 
insurance payout.  Find out as soon as possible just what the score is, 
there have been cases where insurance companies have written cars off and 
sold them on before the owner has been advised.  Good luck.

PaulH.

----- Original Message ----- 
> ... The bulk of the impact was on the
> passenger side over-rider which was pushed into the body next to the gas 
> tank
> filler, leaving a fair indentation. 
_______________________________________________

Mgs@autox.team.net
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: 
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mgs-archive@autox.team.net

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>