I have to keep my cars on a "regular" policy because I don't have a late
model daily driver, and I don't have secured storage (only an open 2-car
carport). Plus, I need the freedom to drive either one anywhere as
necessary, since one or the other may be down for periodic maintenance.
--
Max Heim
'66 MGB GHN3L76149
If you're near Menlo Park, CA,
it's the primer red one with chrome wires
(other car: 1967 Plymouth Barracuda)
on 9/19/12 8:38 AM, Councill, David at dcouncill@msubillings.edu wrote:
> I went with Hagerty for my 72B and 67BGT. They claim to be less restrictive on
> usage and my cars need to be driven - so they sometimes get driven to work. I
> also switched both cars to classic car license plates so they both have been
> converted into the realm of "not for daily use". One of the other key
> qualifiers for classic car insurance is that the cars need to be garaged when
> not driven. So when I got my last addition, the 64B, I didn't have enough
> garage space to add it on the Hagerty policy. And with regular
> insurance/plates, I have no restrictions but its vulnerable on the insurance
> side since it only has liability.
>
> David Councill
> 64 B
> 67 BGT
> 72 B
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mgs-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:mgs-bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf
> Of Charley & Peggy Robinson
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 9:25 AM
> To: mgs@autox.team.net
> Subject: [Mgs] Hagerty Insurance?
>
> Just wondering what auto insurance others are using on their classics.
> I just switched to Hagerty insurance for my '69 MGB, mainly because of the
> low cost stated-value collision & comprehensive coverage compared to my other
> insurer.
>
> CR
_______________________________________________
Mgs@autox.team.net
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mgs-archive@autox.team.net
|