shotimes
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Shotimes] Bondurant 3.0L

To: Joe Masters <miethos@gmail.com>,
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Bondurant 3.0L
From: Ian Fisher <dataflash@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
AFAIK there isn't anything different about them than a
regular SHO engine. If you need to do an engine swap
you may as well do a 3.2 swap. Swapping in a 3.0 seems
counterproductive when a 3.2 swap yields more hp and
torque. 

Ian

--- Joe Masters <miethos@gmail.com> wrote:

> Anybody have a Bondurant engine from FPS in their
> SHO by chance?  I haven't
> heard any feedback on these ever and I was just
> curious about them.  I'm
> looking for a new engine for my 93 mtx and i just
> was curious if these
> engines are worth it or if i should try to find a
> regular sho 3.0 to use
> instead.
> 
> Just curious really!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joe
> '93 mtx black/grey
> 103k - acts like 303k
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>