spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: slant six - was: oil addatives

To: "Nory P" <nory_midget@yahoo.com>, "Andy Webster" <trunkie@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: slant six - was: oil addatives
From: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 12:52:05 -0500
Cc: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Reply-to: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
now here are some sick puppies..... 
sorry guys couldn't stand it... ever thought about running one of these at
Bonneville... hell there has to be a Class for it... there is a class for
everything else...

I mean you could tuck it in your favorite replica of a Healey and you would
have something unique... Hell I bet even Nory could find the statistics on
how fast one has been before.... 

For Ballast you could use Curling Pots or Irons or whatever they call those
thingy's.... (I sure I am about to learn).... then we could get together as
a list and fund the whole exercise as a tax deductible entity... Yeah we
got at least one Lawyer to Pester this week... and Ron could do a little
Math figuring out the CD of a Curling Iron...... 

hmmm just a sick slant .. on a slant6... 


Keith Turk 
Austin Healey 100, Bugeye, Box sprites, Bonneville Camaro ( Land Speed
Racer) 



----------
> From: Nory P <nory_midget@yahoo.com>
> To: Andy Webster <trunkie@hotmail.com>
> Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
> Subject: slant six - was: oil addatives
> Date: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 12:09 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >I had a valiant once , no twice, but 
> >this particular one had the 225c.i. 
> >slant six engine (which I read 
> >somewhere was the most produced engine >ever).
> 
> And among the best engines the US auto industry ever
> produced, in my opinion.  I had a '68 Coronet with the
> slant six and it was unstoppable!  Great engine, great car.
> ===
> 
> ***The above address is for list purposes only.  Please send private
e-mail, as before, to Nory@webtv.net
> -----NORY
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Way/9101
> Don't assume that because you have found one problem, you have found the
ONLY problem. 
> 
> 
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>