spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question re: '60 Bugeye

To: Larry & Sandi Miller <millerls@ado13.com>, "spridgets@autox.team.net" <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Question re: '60 Bugeye
From: Richard Villegas <villegas@home.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 20:44:10 -0700
Organization: @Home Network
References: <37F575DA.F8A143B5@home.com> <001101bf0c84$a284ece0$cc9ee3cd@mbayweb.com>
Reply-to: Richard Villegas <villegas@home.com>
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
Thank you for your reply. The 60 bugeye with the space was bought new in
1959 for $1600. We have all the original paper work and know the
original owner. He said that it never been modified. Could it be a
early  year model?

Larry & Sandi Miller wrote:
> 
> If it's a Bugeye  and there is space behind the seat it has been modified.
> The one with no space would be the original one.
> 
> Larry Miller
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard Villegas <villegas@home.com>
> To: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 1999 8:02 PM
> Subject: Question re: '60 Bugeye
> 
> > A friend of mine owns 2 1960 Bugeye's. We noticed that one car has a
> > large space behind the seats (approx. 1 foot) and the other car has
> > seats located almost against the back with no space in between. Are
> > these 2 completely different models or what/why is there a difference
> > between the interior of these 2 cars. One car is a lot more spacious
> > inside than the other.
> >

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>