spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: "Midgets" MK III vs MK IV

To: "Frank Clarici" <spritenut@Exit109.com>, <Metallian6@aol.com>
Subject: Re: "Midgets" MK III vs MK IV
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 10:33:12 -0500
Cc: "Spridgets" <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Gotta agree, it is my understanding that the RB Midgets have no MK 
designation. Although Mk IV would be correct if there were one.

Larry

At this exact moment in time 2/3/00 12:19 PM, spritenut@Exit109.com made 
the profound statement:

>Metallian6@aol.com wrote:
>> 
>> Hello list. I have a question concerning the production of MK III and MK IV
>> Midgets. It was my understanding that the MK III Midget was ended in 1969 
and
>> the MK IV Midget was started in 1970. Is this right or wrong? I have come
>> across someone who says they have a 1971 Midget MK III and has BMIHT
>> certification stating so. You can see how confused I must be right about 
now.
>
>
>It is my understanding that the MKIV Midget is the rubber bumper Midget.
>MKIII Midget running from 1967 thru 1974.
>But my Midget MKII thru MKIII British Leyland book clearly shows a RB
>midget on the cover. So was there ever a MKIV Midget? Horler refers to
>the RB Midget as 
>"1500 Midget" No MK.
>
>-- 
>Frank Clarici
>Toms River, NJ
>Too many Sprites (again)
>There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
>http://www.exit109.com/~spritenut


Larry B. Macy, Ph.D.
macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu
System Administrator/Manager
Neuropsychiatry Section
Department of Psychiatry
University of Pennsylvania
3400 Spruce St. - 1015 Gates
Philadelphia, PA 19104

 Ask a question and you're a fool for three minutes; do not ask a 
question and you're a fool for the rest of your life. 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>