spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Timing Vs Over Heating--Longish!

To: David Riker <davidr@sunset.net>
Subject: Re: Timing Vs Over Heating--Longish!
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 01:47:50 -0400
Cc: spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Most likely a result of the continued burning of the fuel while the piston
is at a lower position in the cylinder bore and the still burning
combustion going out into the manifold.

Paul A

FROM:   "David Riker", INTERNET:davidr at sunset.net
TO:     "Larry Macy", INTERNET:macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu
        "Paul A. Asgeirsson", PAsgeirsson
CC:     "spridgets", INTERNET:spridgets@autox.team.net
DATE:   7/25/00 11:38 PM

Re:     Re: Timing Vs Over Heating--Longish!

When California was trying to reduce NOx emissions back in the 70's, the
approved kit contained a vacuum cap to disable the distributor vacuum
advance, idle timing of about 6 degrees ATDC, and a warning decal for the
speedometer that read something like "Prolonged speeds above 50 MPH may
result in engine overheating and severe engine damage".  Also, the factory
setting for a 78/79 1500 Midget engine is 2 degrees ATDC, and a common
complaint is engine overheating.  In these two examples, is the additional
heat a result of more complete combustion although occurring at a time in
the cycle when the heat is wasted?  Or is it the unburned fuel burning in
the exhaust system?  Not that it matters, just curious of course.
David Riker

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>