spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: was Spridgetstock 2001 now rain

To: Spridgets <Spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: was Spridgetstock 2001 now rain
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 18:02:19 -0700charset="iso-8859-1"
>>I think it was the Medicine man in some tribes and the        Shaman in
some others.<<

apples to apples my friend.  the difference is essentially that of a priest
and a rabbi! 


Patricia
-----Original Message-----
From Kent J. Miller [mailto:Bushwacker4 at prodigy.net]
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 6:38 PM
To: Spridgets
Subject: Fw: Spridgetstock 2001


Witches can't cast spells that are completely nice in nature. Elizabeth
could probably cause it to rain frogs or something but not just plain old
rain. To get the rain you would have to take whatever comes with it. Since
Elizabeth is so nice, she just doesn't want to cause anybody any
inconvenience with the frogs or whatnot.

Kent
PS - not all Indians can summon the rain. I think it was the Medicine man in
some tribes and the Shaman in some others.

----- Original Message -----
From Brad Fornal <toyman at digitex.net>
To: <DLancer7676@cs.com>
Cc: <fisher@hctc.net>; <RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca>;
<spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: Spridgetstock 2001


> Everybody knows that is the Indians job.................
>
> DLancer7676@cs.com wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 8/21/2000 10:51:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > fisher@hctc.net writes:
> >
> > << still have a burn ban in force by then (boy I really hope we get some
> >  > >> rain before then). >>
> >
> > Elizabeth:
> >
> > Cannot a witch conjur up a spell of rain at will?  8^)
> >
> > --David c.
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>