spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sprite Arrow

To: Bkitterer@aol.com, froggi@cdsnet.net, Bryan.Vandiver@Eng.Sun.COM
Subject: Re: Sprite Arrow
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 09:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
That's 'manufacturers' ;-)

 - Bryan
 
>X-Authentication-Warning: teamfat2.dsl.aros.net: majordom set sender to 
owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net using -f
>Subject: Re: Sprite Arrow
>To: Bkitterer@aol.com, froggi@cdsnet.net
>Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-MD5: AcFgo1CLGwgO/vUfwoYmiw==
>
>The arrows I received from Moss over 2-years ago both fit the holes without 
>any 
>mods(chrome, and gold). I wonder if they changed manufucturers?
>
> - Bryan
> 
>>X-Authentication-Warning: teamfat2.dsl.aros.net: majordom set sender to 
>owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net using -f
>>X-Accept-Language: en
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>To: Bkitterer@aol.com
>>CC: spridgets@autox.team.net
>>Subject: Re: Sprite Arrow
>>
>>Why can't these SOB's get it right in the first place!?!  Why do we continue
>>to purchase inferior parts?  Send 'em back if they don't fit.  Eventually
>>they'll get the message that we are NOT going to 'compromise our standards'.
>>
>>Am I the only one that thinks this way?
>>WFO Herb
>>
>>
>>Bkitterer@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> One option on the current after market arrows is to file the edges of the
>>> pins so that they fit the holes in the body.  Just a thought.
>>>
>>> Bob and Annice
>>> 1960 Sprite (Mk IV in disguise)
>>> 1967 Sprite Mk III (in progress)
>>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>