spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Intake restrictions

To: dmeadow@juno.com, John.Deikis@med.va.gov
Subject: RE: Intake restrictions
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:01:41 -0400
Cc: spridgets-digest@autox.team.net
Carb gasket, not manifold gasket.  And it's at the intake side of the intake
manifold, not the "exit".

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Littlefield [SMTP:dmeadow@juno.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:19 PM
> To:   John.Deikis@med.va.gov
> Cc:   spridgets-digest@autox.team.net
> Subject:      Re: Intake restrictions
> 
> John,
> 
> Sounds like your head and your manifold were ported by a PO.  The stock
> setup has a sleeve that fits into the head and the manifold that normally
> wouldn't allow a gasket to interfere with the flow.  When the head and
> manifold are ported the step on both that accommodates the sleeve would
> be eliminated (as would the sleeve itself).
> 
> Moss sells a "competition" manifold gasket that has larger holes for this
> reason.
> 
> David Littlefield
> '62 MGA MkII
> '51 MGTD
> '74 MG Midget vintage racer
> '61 Jaguar E-Type OTS
> 
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 11:07:25 -0500 John.Deikis@med.va.gov writes:
> > The carb to manifold gaskets are smaller in ID than the manifold 
> > port.  This
> > is also true for the holes through the heat shield.  Lots of good a 
> > 1 1/4-in
> > carb is if it has to flow through a 1 1/8 hole in the heat shield to 
> > get
> > into the manifold.  Finally, the carb side of the manifold has a 
> > nicely
> > machined transition at the entrance (is that original?) but 
> > absolutelty no
> > attention paid to flow through the remainder of the intake venturi.  
> > Seems
> > peculiar to do just a little machining and not create a nice surface 
> > all the
> > way through the manifold.  

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>