spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Retorquing Head - why three yrs?

To: "'Robert E. Shlafer'" <PilotRob@webtv.net>
Subject: RE: Retorquing Head - why three yrs?
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:39:38 -0600
Cc: <spridgets@Autox.Team.Net>
Thread-index: AcS/eIwP7hzeigvqQp2m4Uz+gc53MAAAFMnA
Compression test dry was in the 155 to 165 range on all 4.  Well within the
10% specs.  Didn't bother with a wet test.

-----Original Message-----
From Robert E. Shlafer [mailto:PilotRob at webtv.net] 
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:37 PM
To: Michael Graziano
Cc: spridgets@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: RE: Retorquing Head - why three yrs?

Ahh...I perceive, Michael...

well, then....you have "reason" to retorque
and apparently, nothing to lose and everything to gain by doing so,
considering the contents of your most
recent post on the subject.

If overheating is responsible for the rough
running, I don't think you'll get the "seal"
back, ass-u-me(ing) this is the culprit with
respect to rough running. Metal's got a 
memory, after all. But just maybe, you
can "gently persuade" it, eh?? :):)

Well, why not then. A compression/leak-
down sounds in order, though.




Cap'n. Bob 
     '60 :{)

Check out the new British Cars Forum:
http://www.team.net/the-local/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=8





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>