spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Part 2: Race tech report - MG content - very LONG

To: spridgets@autox.team.net
Subject: Part 2: Race tech report - MG content - very LONG
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 14:18:11 EST
Split into 2 parts because the one single big e-mail seemed not to work.

In a message dated 02/04/05 19:43:39 GMT Daylight Time, Daniel1312 writes:

> Apart from a tea-break and general nose around the service area (cars get 
> serviced in-between runs) I got to watch some of the cars at a good vantage 
> point.  The 6R4 was very quick and turned out to be the quickest car of the 
>day 
> and of course the best sounding.  Second fastest was a 2000cc Nissan Micra 
> which is a tiny eurobox and engine obviously non-standard in size and tune.  
> The cars came along a fast part of the track which must have been over 
> 100-110mph for the quicker cars and probably another 20-30mph quicker still 
>for the 
> top 5 or 6 cars.  Some of the 2000cc 1970s vintage Escorts were running 
> Modern (well 1990s) Cosworth YBF (and derivatives) engines but on that 
>stretch 'on 
> song' either needed a taller back axle ratio or a 5th gear.  No big deal you 
> might think, I mean who hasn't been up close to nice machinery going that 
> fast (I have a lot these last few years) but how about a true hairpin corner 
>at 
> the end of it?  I was interested to see who lifted for the kink before the 
> hairpin, and then when back to flat, who lifted, steady throttled and braked 
> and not least who didn't lift, kept it flat out or were still accelerating 
> (the 6R4).  Then, who locks wheels, who doesn't who goes through the cones, 
>onto 
> the grass and spins altogether, hello hay bale.  The rear wheel drive cars 
> were tail out and roared out the hairpin.  Some handbrake turns worked and 
> some didn't.  Best of all the hairpin was part of each of the 6 stages but 
>for 
> half had a shorter straight before it.  The TR8 never looked or sounded fast 
> and the stage times confirmed this.  I don't think it was particularly the 
> driver the car just sounded like it never pulled a lot of rpm and apart from 
>the 
> carb swap sounded close to being on a standard/mild cam or was on a 
> standard/mild cam (less than 200bhp but ok lots of torque) - still it looked 
>nice.  
> Almost forget there was a Vauxhall Chevette that looked pretty neat but this 
> had neither the rally Vauxhall 2000cc or the Lotus version but a modern 
>2000cc 
> Vauxhall with I guess 200 to 250bhp.  There were some tidy cars like a Mk1 
> VW Golf that was well driven and lot of other cars that just merged in to a 
> stream of fast but sometimes entertaining euroboxes.  The very early and 
> original looking 1293cc Mini went well but looked like it would 2 wheel and 
>roll at 
> one point.  A lot of the front wheel drive cars 3 wheeled, lifting one of 
> the rears at the hairpin.  The vee-8 Metro sounded nice for a vee-8 and ran 
>5th 
> and after that at 6th came the first EVO (Ha).  Only one car had a heavy 
> impact and unusually for a rally, so I'm told, no-one rolled.  
> 
> At one point I needed to talk to the driver of Mk 2 Escort but he retired on 
> one stage (ended up missing the next one but got back out again) and I 
> caught up with him as he was towed in.  Turns out the coil fried the rotor 
>arm 
> (eh??) and they couldn't fit a spare because the distributor cap was a screw 
>fit 
> and they had no screw driver.  I suggested it was pity they couldn't have 
> used a pair of pliers.  In fact it was a pity the pair of pliers that fell 
>out 
> of their car on the track did fall out because they might have come in 
> useful.  The driver was suitably surprised.
> 
> Not forgetting the other MG which was a Maestro and with I guess, an MG 
> Montego Turbo conversion.  Car had a lot of trouble, almost certainly a blown 
> head gasket and never really ran that well, and they had trouble getting it 
>to 
> run at all with a lot of tow starting.
> 
> That's it then, hope that's given you a flavour of the day, with another 
> race tech day done and possibly June before I do another but I'm going to try 
> and get something as a no expenses claimed extra.
> 
> Daniel1312          





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Part 2: Race tech report - MG content - very LONG, Unknown <=