spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Which part for paint color matching?

To: "John D'Agostino" <john.dagostino@comcast.net>, "John Gottstein" <gottstein@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Which part for paint color matching?
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:55:33 -0400
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Message-ID:X-Priority:Reply-To:X-Mailer:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-type; b=rAWBpsfmnjiKKBCRbonMjfO5hnI34ewzCpcf+jZABYK2WVSA+4ZuiAMWL2M+6XgW;
there has been 1 item of the spectral analisys of the color wich has been
overlooked!
it is extremly importaint to polish(rubbing compound to remove dead paint
and stains and dirt) and wax(to bring back the shine of the area  you need
to read)  or buff and wax the area about 12" square and as flat as possible
in order for the reader to reccomend a paint match!    if you do not do
this the paint reading device will give you a paint code that matches your
dirty of flat finished car's worn finish!  then if you ever clean or polish
the car you will have a very noticeable two tone car wich i'm guessing you
are trying to completly avoid if not minimise as much as possible! 
john, there is no small piece that you can remove from a spridget wich is
at least 12" square and flat (the reading device needs a flat surface like
the upper trunk skin, center of door skin, possibly very rear area of the
hood, or rear front wing area on the side.).

chuck.
back to stealth mode!  
lately i'm cursed with "reverse midas effect" evrything i lay hands on
turns to...., well you get the idea! 


> [Original Message]
> From: John D'Agostino <john.dagostino@comcast.net>
> To: John Gottstein <gottstein@gmail.com>
> Cc: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
> Date: 07/13/2005 7:06:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Which part for paint color matching?
>
> Hi.
> Drive the car or take the trunk lid to your local autobody supply store,
or
> body shop, most of them have an "optical analyzing thingy" that will scan
> the paint and give them a code to mix.
>
> Hope this helps.
> John





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>