spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Spridgets] Timing Question

To: Spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] Timing Question
From: fastvee <fastvee@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
He wouldn't have meant cam timing because that change won't net more torque,
just shift the torque in the RPM range. Now ignition timing definitely affects
torque, and maybe what he said is true for a specific application. Just a WAG,
If you had a fuel that resisted detonation yet burned at a faster rate you
wouldn't need as much timing, and a later ignition might put more force to the
crank throw. Nitro methane? Maybe he was a drag racer? The only thing retarded
timing would accomplish for us would be overheating.
John
Fogelsville, PA

--- On Thu, 5/21/09, David Lieb <72spridget@gmail.com> wrote:

From: David Lieb <72spridget@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] Timing Question
To: "Spridgets" <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 3:34 PM

> Some guy I was talking to the other day was telling me that the further you
> retard your timing, the more torque you are going to pull from your engine.
> . . I can maybe see that to a point, but not sure how a 1275 would be
> affected?

I believe the guy was talking about CAM timing, NOT ignition timing.
You are subscribed as fastvee@yahoo.com

http://www.team.net/archive

http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html


http://www.team.net/archive

http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>