spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

[Spridgets] Paint shop fiasco

Subject: [Spridgets] Paint shop fiasco
From: WeslakeMonza1330 at aol.com (WeslakeMonza1330 at aol.com)
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 05:41:24 -0400 (EDT)
Yep, and if $1000 only gets a really crap paint job because that's all they 
 do for $1000 they ought to give him his money back so he save up for a  
$3000  job.  The paint shop's problem is that they either can't do a  decent 
job for $1000 and so shouldn't have taken the job or advised you get a  crap 
job for that price or they can't do a decent job at any price.
 
Weslake-Monza 1330
 
 
In a message dated 01/05/2011 21:38:43 GMT Daylight Time,  
ladaniels at sbcglobal.net writes:

Whether  Ryan got the deal of the century at $1000 really doesn't matter  
here.  He had a contract to do the job at that price.  In this  state (WI) 
it 
doesn't even matter if he got it in writing as an oral  contract is just as 
enforceable as a written contract.  I suspect  that is the case in most 
states.  They had an agreement and the shop  needs to live up to it even if 
they lose money on the deal.  At this  point they have breached the 
contract. 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>