tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re[2]: Conversion Conversation

To: nicholsj@oakwood.org, larryall@pacbell.net
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Conversion Conversation
From: HW200@aol.com
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 11:45:04 -0500 (EST)
In a message dated 97-10-28 11:37:16 EST, nicholsj@oakwood.org writes:

<< Maybe some of the 'real' documented Tigers are rebodies.  Think about it.
  >>

That of course is a reality. I know of it first hand. Secondly, there are
originals that are questioned as "fakes". Like I said it has happened and
will continue to in the future. Mistakes are made. To add insult to injury
that same bad information is looged in to a "registry" with those mistakes to
de-value someone's investment. There are to sides to this-


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>