Hey Guys!
I've been lurking for quite a while now, but I just can't keep quiet any
longer! How about those guys who want to pursue the "to TAC or not to TAC"
question and the morality of revealing that a car may not be traceable back
to the "one true Tiger" do so somewhere else? This last missive about
pondering the meaining of TAC 7 miles above the earth is more than my
stomach can stand. Some people are taking themselves way to seriously here!
I can tell you that, if I was pondering dropping serious money in order to
get an honest-to-god Mark II Tiger, I wouldn't depend only on the word of a
self-sanctioned committee who got together and said "We're the experts
because we say we are experts and after all, we are the experts." I would
be pretty confident that if they told me it was a fake, it would indeed be a
fake. But that ain't near enough. Anybody who would drop 30 large on the
strength of a TAC certification would be fair game for any serious con
artist worth his salt! Having a car TAC's is a clear no-win proposition.
You either find out that it definitely is a fake, or maybe it isn't. Such a
deal!
(And it's just a coincidence that my name is Joe!)
Joe
|