| To: | laifman@flash.net, rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: “Junk Yards” |
| From: | RSpontelli@aol.com |
| Date: | Tue, 23 May 2000 14:49:03 EDT |
<<Calling a valuable source of supply a =93Junk Yard=94 demeans the source, and the purchaser. We really need a more up-scale term, commensurate with our valuable restorations.>> As long as we can do it without messing with the almost-sacred term "Junk-yard Dog." Ramon |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RE: alternator], Chris Vaught |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: ?Junk Yards?, Theo Smit |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RE: alternator], Chris Vaught |
| Next by Thread: | RE: ?Junk Yards?, Theo Smit |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |