tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Smog again

To: joel@joelharris.com
Subject: Re: Smog again
From: Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:29:29 -0800
For those of us that drive our classics every day, I sure hope they don't 
come up with something that suggests limits on driving - since these 
knuckleheads will want to think that people don't possibly drive these 
cars every day.

Jay





joelharris <joel@joelharris.com>
02/27/2003 06:19 PM

 
        To:     "Tony McNulty" <t.mcnulty@ieee.org>, 
Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com, 
alpines@autox.team.net, tigers@autox.team.net
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: Smog again


Hey guys,

I yapped with a future politician named Michael at Mr. Flores office this
afternoon.

He said the flack they are getting from this is huge (big suprise), they 
are
busy putting an amendment through to make "Classic" cars exempt.

He was quick to say they are clueless at this point how they will define 
all
those "Classics".

According to him If they are not successful it creating a definition the
majority are happy with they will drop the bill...should get interesting.

Joel Harris
Los Gatos, Ca.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony McNulty <t.mcnulty@ieee.org>
To: Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com <Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com>;
alpines@autox.team.net <alpines@autox.team.net>; tigers@autox.team.net
<tigers@autox.team.net>
Date: Thursday, February 27, 2003 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: Smog again


>Will this take all the taco-wagons off the road in California?  Please
>forward this inquiry to Sr. Flores, I'd love to hear from him.
>:-)))))))))))))))))  I may also tell him what I think of his know-nothing
>butt.
>
>God, I hate fools.
>
>Tony
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com>
>To: <alpines@autox.team.net>; <tigers@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 7:01 PM
>Subject: Smog again
>
>
>Subject: Change in the California Smog Law
>From:    Harry Pellow <maestro@well.com>
>Date:    Thu, 27 Feb 2003 05:01:32 -0800
>
>Listers (especially those in California!):
>
>  Several years ago, when the California Legislature was in more
>reasonable
>hands, they passed a law that saved 912's from Extinction by exempting
>from
>the Smog Tests any car made in 1973 or earlier.
>
>  This was to be an ongoing "30 year and out rule", starting in 2003- any
>car 30 years old or older was going to be EXEMPT from smog tests due to
>the
>difficuties of getting parts, knowledgeable service, etc.
>
> Now that ever major elected office is held by Democrats, one (Mr Flores)
>has taken it upon himself to UN-Exempt these cars! Replacing the "30 year
>and out" rule with "45 years and out", starting in 2005, which means 
that:
>
>A. ALL 912's will once again be affected, must be tested and will 
probably
>fail the test!
>
>B. 1960-1965 356's will be affected, even thugh THERE WERE NO SMOG RULES
>fom 1960-1963! (And PCV systems only in 1964 and 1965!)
>
>
>  So, if you agree with Mr Flores and his wonderous new Bill SB-708,
>please
>send him your complements.
>
>  Conversly, if you DISAGREE, let him know that too. He'll most likely
>ignore you.
>
>  And just because you DON'T live in Wonderful, Warm, California- don't
>think it can't happen to YOU in your State!  As California goes, so goes
>the Nation!
>
>
>Keep the 356/912 Faith
>Maestro

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>