tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

289 v. 347 Query

To: tigers@autox.team.net
Subject: 289 v. 347 Query
From: huroner@juno.com
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:16:55 -0500
Does anyone know if  the 289 is in jeopardy of becoming extinct for small
block Ford enthusiasts or is the scarcity of parts like the 2.87" stroke
crankshaft only a (Midwest) regional problem? 

I'm undecided whether to rebuild and continue with my 289 or change over
to building a stroker small block like the 347 that seem to have more
current parts availability and improved performance.  

Articles describing the massive increases in torque and power of the 347
stroker, i.e. Lunati kit, hadn't included descriptions of the every day
liveability of this high performance beast nor the compatibility of its
output with the frame, mounts, torque deflection and drive line
components of the Tiger.

Can anyone describe their experience and recommendations on the stroker
variations, options and use?

Rob Hogan
B382001560 (June 1969 - )
Marshall, MI

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 289 v. 347 Query, huroner <=