tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: originality

To: Rande Bellman <rande@thecia.net>
Subject: Re: originality
From: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 23:00:43 -0600
Hi Rande,
I don't disagree with your assessment of the Miles Tiger, or of Bo 
Cheadle's efforts, one bit. I overheard parts of his conversations with 
others, including Dick Barker, where they swapped stories about the 
efforts they went through to find the correct parts or track down the 
original parts for their respective cars, and I have nothing but 
admiration for the tenacity and determination that was required to turn 
their Tigers from piles of scattered parts, to the showpieces they are 
today. The level of effort they went through was well above and beyond 
what is required for an ordinary restoration, and they didn't cut any 
corners. In both their cases, the cars were far from 'original' when 
they came into their ownership, and I think there's a difference between 
restoring a car such as the Miles car, where you're undoing thirty years 
of poor stewardship, and restoring a car such as Bill Carroll's, that's 
been taken care of in a manner that reflects the owner's appreciation 
for what the car means to the Tiger community.

I'm no expert on the various Ferrari and Maserati sports racers that 
were built in the fifties, but as I understand it, there was a trend 
when 'restoring' them, where it was standard procedure to grind down and 
smooth out all the welds on the frame because that looked better. Of 
course in the process, they would also wipe away any sign of the 
craftsmanship (or lack of it, I suppose) that was used to create the 
frames to begin with. When I wrote 'it's only original once', it's more 
that kind of erasing of history that I was thinking of.

My Tiger has holes on the rear shelf where a previous owner mounted a 
roll bar. It had a couple of extra holes in the transmission tunnel for 
easier access to the bellhousing bolts. There was some tremendous road 
rash on the right front lower control arm, and the chassis still has 
stress cracks on the rear spring mounts. It's been three different 
colors - the original 86 green, a darker red, and the current Carnival 
red. The engine that I took out is a 289 five bolt with polished heads 
and a cam. I've added in a welded-in roll bar, patched the transmission 
tunnel holes, and I'm in the process of doing some very non-stock 
suspension work, besides putting in the 5.0.

All of these non-original things are restorable, but it's also part of 
what makes my Tiger what it is - it's all the things that it's been over 
the last 39 years, for the other owners, and for me. The car got all of 
these things through its lifetime, and I for one would be thrilled if I 
showed the car at some meet and someone were to walk up, have a good 
look at the car, and then tell me that they knew the car because of some 
little thing that they did with it.
This doesn't mean that I can't understand the  'original is best' point 
of view - I have kept any original parts that I've removed from the car, 
because they are part of the car even if they're not currently ON the 
car... if you know what I mean.

Best regards,
Theo





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>