tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] frame off ??

To: AAAGLASSS@aol.com, tigers@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Tigers] frame off ??
From: jhef101@aol.com
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:59:41 -0500
I dunno, I have a '65 according to Norm and the Book but it says '64 on the
title. What do I have? The title kinda defines the year doesn't it?


Jeff Hefner
B9470028






-----Original Message-----
From: AAAGLASSS@aol.com
To: tigers@autox.team.net
Sent: Fri, Jan 29, 2010 7:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Tigers] frame off ??


And all the people selling 66MK1 Tigers and saying they are 67's, cause
hey were registered in 67. Don't they know what they have???


n a message dated 1/29/2010 3:53:34 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
lydemclaughlin@verizon.net writes:
I often  have to stop and think for a minute or less whenn I see an add for

ar  that is unibody ie no frame is advertised as having a "frame  off"
esto....I see it all the time when reading Hemmings....Does the  advertiser
ave a clue???  Just a thought,   Clyde
ou are subscribed as  aaaglasss@aol.com
Tigers@autox.team.net
ttp://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
http://www.team.net/archive
You are subscribed as jhef101@aol.com
Tigers@autox.team.net
ttp://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html


Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers

http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>