The biggest shame of our legal system is when someone can take a job at a joint
called "Hooters" and then sue for sexual harassment. What ever happen to
assumption of risk?
----------
From: Berry Kercheval[SMTP:kerch@parc.xerox.com]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 1996 12:56 PM
To: Pat Leask
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net; kerch@parc.xerox.com
Subject: Re: Clear "Hooters" ????!!
>>>Pat Leask said:
> Snip:Barry, You didn't say which car you were driving, but if it was the '72
> Spit, the switch is likely to be Clear Hooters, not Lucas. CH is even
>
> Humm. "CH" would never be able to use that company name in todays political
> climate....
Remember, this was an English company. England is a place where they name
towns "Little Dorking" with a straight face.
--berry
Berry Kercheval :: kerch@parc.xerox.com :: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center
|