triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

triumphs@autox.team.net digest #2027 Thu Mar 16 02:35:00 MST 2000

To: "technical@iwnet.screaming.net" <technical@iwnet.screaming.net>, Triumph List <triumphs@autox.team.net> charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: triumphs@autox.team.net digest #2027 Thu Mar 16 02:35:00 MST 2000
From: Tony Rhodes <ARhodes@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 18:56:19 -0500
Message text written by INTERNET:triumphs-owner@autox.team.net
>From: "Graham Stretch" <technical@iwnet.screaming.net>
Subject: Re: Machine shop work


Hi Douglas
>but 60-62 on the Rockwell C scale should damn
>near put flats on the teeth of your file,

Well, the file does skip across the steel.

>Hey presto instantly you loose 1/3 of the hardness thickness, though 0.020" 
>should be
>reasonably good for the task in hand.

I think the issue is the thickeness of the hardened surface, and the ductility 
of the 
steel under the surface.  As the rollers go over the surface, they do not 
damage the surface at
all, but they appear to fatigue the transition layer.  Eventually there is a 
shell
of hardened surface which finally starts to peel off.

I think we need to go with a thicker hardened surface, and maybe a harder
steel underneath.  What is should be, I don't know.  I am sure SOMEONE knows.


-Tony


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>