triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: alot

To: randallyoung@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: alot
From: KTRIUMPH@aol.com
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 00:03:53 EDT
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net
In a message dated 9/23/00 8:43:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
randallyoung@earthlink.net writes:

<< If your argument is that it is not properly part of the English
 language, then I would argue that English is a living language, defined
 by common usage, not by some dictionary. 50 years ago, the word
 "transistor" was nowhere to be found, and the word "computer" meant a
 person who did mathematics.  We make up new words and change the meaning
 of old ones all the time.  The dictionaries cannot hope to keep up.  In
 fact, the entire concept of dictionary is a much newer invention than
 English. >>

I'd say "fluif" is a perfect example of the above point! (But you all knew 
THAT one was coming!)

Ken Nuelle
58 TR3A
62 TR3B
64 TR4
69 TR6

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>